This page is intended as a source of reference for the study and understanding of stand your ground laws.
- Stand Your Ground Laws and Their Effect on Violent Crime and the Criminal Justice System (Mayors Against Illegal Guns)
- No Ground on Which to Stand: Revise Stand Your Ground Laws So Survivors of Domestic Violence are No Longer Incarcerated for Defending Their Lives (Brandi L. Jackson in Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice)
- ‘Stand Your Ground’ Laws: Civil Rights and Public Safety Implications of the Expanded Use of Deadly Force (Urban Institute study for Senate Committee on Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights)
- American Bar Association Report on Stand Your Ground Laws (ABA National Task Force)
- Does Media Coverage Of Stand Your Ground Laws Deter Crime? (Sam Houston State University)
- Does Strengthening Self-Defense Law Deter Crime or Escalate Violence? (Texas A&M)
- Expansions to the Castle Doctrine: Implications For Policy And Practice (National District Attorneys Association)
- Shoot to Kill: A Critical Look at Stand Your Ground Laws (University of Miami)
- Marissa Alexander’s Appeals Court Legal Ruling
- Stand Your Ground Laws and Homicides (Georgia State University)
- Stand Your Ground: History, Development, & Significance of the Trayvon Martin Case (National Black Law Students Association)
- Tampa Bay Times Coverage of Florida’s Stand Your Ground Laws
- Trayvon’s Law (NAACP)
- Does Your State Have A Stand Your Ground Law?
- A Comparison of Florida and Louisiana Stand Your Ground Law
- Effects of Stand-Your-Ground Laws on Violent Crime (RAND Corporation)
- Stand Your Ground Laws, Homicides, & Injuries (National Bureau of Economic Research)
America has a long history of enshrining racial disparity in state and national laws, from the openly race-based policies of slavery and segregation, to the more recent and subtle policies around profiling, “stop-and-frisk” and the so-called War on Drugs. Several states with especially brutal legacies of institutionalized racism have reconfigured and enforced their self-defense laws in ways that have many Americans concerned that these laws may not be as race-neutral as their supporters claim. We take a look at the historical background and present application of these new Stand Your Ground laws.
DUTY TO RETREAT
English Common Law required that an individual, when threatened, must “retreat to the wall at one’s back” before justifiably killing someone. Only the crown could kill someone and justify it. Everyone else had to get a pardon from the king if they killed someone. The only way to do that was to prove that you did everything you could not to kill someone.
“private persons are not to be trusted to take capital revenge one of another.” – Sir Matthew Hale, Jurist
This English Common Law became America’s Common Law and is the starting point for all self defense laws to follow.
Castle Doctrine is another English Common Law adopted in America to remove people from the “duty to retreat” when attacked in their own home. Every state supports the Castle Doctrine through legislation, case law, or common law.
“A man’s house is his castle — et domus sua cuique est tutissimum refugium” (and where shall a man be safe if it be not in his own house?) -Sir Edwar Coke, The Institutes of the Laws of England, 1628.
Everywhere else, one must try to retreat when threatened if it is safe to do so, before committing to killing someone in self defense.
STAND YOUR GROUND
Stand Your Ground laws are renovations to the Castle Doctrines already found in the states. In fact, they are often called Castle Doctrine Expansions. They are also called ‘Shoot First’, ‘The Right to Commit’ Murder’, ‘Line in the Sand’, and ‘Make My Day’ laws.
These are laws that extend the castle doctrine in several different ways:
Location – Nobody has ever had to retreat when threatened in the home. SYG laws remove the ‘duty to retreat’ from outside the home as well.
Presumption – Justifiable homicide requires a ‘reasonable belief’ that a serious threat has been posed, and the threat must be ‘imminent’. SYG laws presume that the surviving party had ‘reasonable belief’ or that the threat was ‘imminent’ or simply that the survivor killed legally in self defense. In other words, it’s up to the non-survivor’s party to prove otherwise.
Immunity – Generally speaking, criminal law punishes wrongdoers, and civil law attempts to restore what was damaged to whoever has been wronged. SYG laws give the survivor immunity from civil law suits and sometimes criminal law suits and even arrest.
Threat – Some states don’t require there to be a ‘reasonable belief’ that a serious threat has been posed or that the danger be ‘imminent’.
On October 1, 2005, the NRA (former President and current lobbyist, Marion P. Hammer) and Florida Republicans (Senator Durrell Peadon and Representative Dennis Baxley) drafted a bill that would soon change the way Americans defend themselves. Jeb Bush signed it into law, and with the help of ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) the NRA introduced similar bills all over the country. The law did five major things:
- Removed duty to retreat
- Created a presumption of “reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm”
- Expanded the protection of the “castle doctrine” to guests and temporary residences.
- Provided immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action.
- Established a prohibition against arresting an individual for the use of such force, unless there is probable cause that the use of force was unlawful.
Florida’s self defense death rate tripled.
- 12 “justifiable homicide” deaths a year from 2000-2004.
- 35 “justifiable homicide” deaths a year from 2005-2010.
On a national scale, the number of justifiable homicides has increased from 176 in 2000 to 196 in 2005 to 326 in 2010.
Firearms were used in 80% of justifiable cases and 65% of non-justifiable cases.
87.4% of justifiable homicides between strangers used guns.
71.3 of non-justifiable homicides between strangers used guns.
Number of Justifiable Homicides over time (SYG/Non-SYG)
(SYG: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia)
- 2000: 85/91
- 2001: 110/123
- 2002: 123/122
- 2003: 129/136
- 2004: 117/111
- 2005: 106/108
- 2006: 131/122
- 2007: 187/110
- 2008: 194/98
- 2009: 199/112
- 2010: 222/104
Homicides from 2005-2010 by black/white:
- White on white: 23,000/53,000 (justified in 460 of them – 2%)
- White on Black: 2,069/53,000 (justified in 236 of them – 11.4%)
- Black on white: 1,210/53,000 (justified in 17 of them – 1.4%)
- Black on Black: slightly lower than white on white
In SYG states, the odds that a white-on-black homicide is ruled to have been justified is more than 11 times the odds a black-on-white shooting is ruled justified.
States with various Jim Crow laws 1876 and 1965.
Education: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming.
Hospital and Prisons: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia.
Marriage: Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming.
Public Accommodations: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
Transportation: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
Extrajudicial Execution (Lynching) from 1882-1968
Lynching is a form of punishment for presumed criminal offenses, performed by self-appointed commissions, mobs, or vigilantes without due process of law.
Number of Black and White Lynchings by state (Black Lynchings/White Lynchings)
Alabama (299/48), Alaska (?/?), Arizona (0/31), Arkansas (226/58), California (2/41), Colorado (3/65), Connecticut (?/?), Delaware (1/0), D.C. (?/?), Florida (257/25), Georgia (492/39), Hawaii (?/?), Idaho (0/20), Illinois (19/15), Indiana (14/33), Iowa (2/17), Kansas (19/35), Kentucky (142/63), Louisiana (335/56), Maine (0/1), Maryland (27/2), Massachusetts (?/?), Michigan (1/7), Minnesota (4/5), Mississippi (539/42), Missouri (69/53), Montana (2/82), Nebraska (5/52), Nevada (0/60), New Hampshire (?/?), New Jersey (1/1), New Mexico (3/33), New York (1/1), North Carolina (86/15), North Dakota (3/13), Ohio (16/10), Oklahoma (40/82), Oregon (1/20), Pennsylvania (6/2), Rhode Island (?/?), South Carolina (156/4), South Dakota (0/27), Tennessee (204/47), Texas (352/141), Utah (2/6), Vermont (0/1), Virginia (83/17), Washington (1/25), West Virginia (28/20), Wisconsin (0/6), Wyoming (5/30)
Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia.
When most of the states that support Stand Your Ground laws are the same as the above states, it’s no wonder many Americans are concerned about the black and white of stand your ground.
“Fear, is oftentimes, based on ones own bias, so when you have public policy that, literally lends itself to people being able to commit crimes or shootings under the color of law, because they’re reasonably afraid, it makes a bad public policy and puts the constitutional rights of so many people around the country in jeopardy.” -The Reverend Markel Hutchins
The Black & White Of Stand Your Ground (Infographic, explanation, and History)
TEXAS A & M STUDY:
NATIONAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION, “Stand Your Ground” – History, Development, & Significance of the Trayvon Martin Case”: